On July 21, 2025, thousands of Jakarta ojol drivers gathered in a massive rally to voice their concerns and demands. The demonstration, known as “Aksi 217,” aimed to address issues related to fare policies, driver welfare, and regulatory transparency. Organized by the Indonesian Online Motorcycle Taxi Drivers Association (Garda Indonesia), the rally took place in the Silang Selatan area near Monas, Jakarta. The drivers were joined by supporters, including passengers and students, who identified themselves as “victims of the platform operators.”
Fare Policy Reform: A Central Demand from Jakarta Ojol Drivers
A primary demand from the rally was the establishment of clear and fair fare policies. The drivers called for a fixed revenue-sharing scheme, proposing that they receive 90% of the fare, with the remaining 10% going to the platform operators. This proposal aims to ensure that drivers are adequately compensated for their services.
Welfare and Social Protection for Jakarta Ojol Drivers
The drivers also advocated for improved welfare benefits, including health insurance, accident coverage, and pension schemes. They emphasized the need for social protection to safeguard their livelihoods and well-being, as many drivers currently lack adequate coverage.
Regulatory Clarity and Participation
Another key demand was for clearer regulations governing online transportation services. The drivers urged the government to enact comprehensive laws or regulations that address the unique challenges of the online transportation sector. They also called for their involvement in the policymaking process to ensure that their perspectives are considered.
Transparent Commission Structures
The rally participants demanded transparency in the commission structures imposed by platform operators. They expressed concerns over inconsistent deductions and unclear explanations regarding commission fees, which they believe negatively impact their earnings.
Improved Working Conditions and Safety Measures
Lastly, the drivers called for enhanced working conditions and safety measures. They requested the removal of discriminatory schemes such as “Aceng,” “Slot,” and “Hub,” which they argue undermine fair competition and equitable earnings. Additionally, they sought better traffic management and stricter enforcement of passenger conduct regulations to ensure their safety on the road.
Conclusion: Toward Fair Treatment for Jakarta Ojol Drivers
The ongoing Jakarta ojol drivers rally reflects deeper systemic challenges faced by ride-hailing workers. Addressing these five demands could pave the way for a more equitable and sustainable online transportation ecosystem in Indonesia. It is imperative for both the government and platform operators to engage in dialogue with drivers to find solutions that balance the interests of all stakeholders.
